Leader of the Opposition, Bill Shorten, has given an unequivocal commitment to the final two years of Gonski funding. This shifts the microscope to the May Budget to see whether the Coalition Government supports an increase in school funding into the fifth year of the Gonski plan.<
There appears to be a new unity ticket between Labor and the Coalition on the Gonski school funding. Labor is having second thoughts about supporting the full Gonski.
Gonski panel member, Ken Boston, has slammed the Labor Party for failing on the politics of delivering the full Gonski school funding model.
At Senate Estimates hearings last month officials from the Federal Department of Education confirmed the Government’s sabotage of the Gonski funding model.
Christopher Pyne has opportunistically grasped states’ rights to sabotage the Gonski funding plan by not requiring state governments to increase education funding. Yet, the Government is keeping conditions attached to other specific purpose payments to the states.
The Coalition has sabotaged the Gonksi funding plan. It has guaranteed funding increases for private schools but not for government schools.
The Gonski review report and documents removed from the website of the Federal Department of Education are available here.
In an extraordinary move, the Gonski report and related documents have been removed from the website of the Federal Department of Education. It is an indication of how opposed Christopher Pyne is to the Gonski funding model.
An overview of the new National Plan for School Improvement.
A new review of research studies on the relationship between expenditure on schools and education outcomes has added to the weight of evidence supporting the Gonski funding model. Numerous international studies conducted since the early 2000s show a positive impact of increased expenditure in schools, especially for disadvantaged students.
The Gonski funding model is on the right track in boosting funding for under-resourced schools and disadvantaged students. The refusal of the Victorian, Queensland, Western Australian and Northern Territory governments to sign on to Gonski will deprive low income, Indigenous and remote area students of the chance to improve their results.
A research review has found that money does matter in education. Increasing school funding improves student results and that more targeted spending benefits students from disadvantaged backgrounds. Gonski is on the right track.
The Gillard school funding plan is a potential watershed for school funding in Australia. It breaks new ground with its focus on increasing equity in education. However, it is not the full Gonski.
The OECD has endorsed the findings of the Gonksi report on school funding that the current system lacks coherence and transparency and that reducing inequities in education is a key policy challenge for Australia.
The economic case for the $6.5 billion investment in disadvantaged schools and students recommended by the Gonski review of school funding is just as compelling as the equity and social justice case.
The national partnerships on literacy and numeracy and low SES schools have not increased student results to any significant extent. The reason is that the funding per student is very small. The funding loadings for disadvantaged students under the new school funding model will have to be large to make a sustainable difference to school outcomes for these students.
Private schools around Australia and in Victoria would get a hidden windfall gain of up to $90 million a year from the Baillieu funding plan. A funding system that allows private schools to triple-dip on the taxpayer is an outrage and must be replaced.
There is a compelling economic case for increasing funding for disadvantaged schools as recommended by the Gonski review of school funding. Low student achievement and school completion rates impose high economic costs.
The Federal Government should end the secrecy on its preferred school funding model. The secret negotiations with state governments and private schools should be opened up to include government school organisations and the public. <
NSW Premier, Barry O’Farrell, has rebuffed a call by an unprecendented coalition of government and private school organisations to reverse the plan to cut $1.7 billion from the NSW education budget over the next four years.
The real class war in education was on show this week as political leaders scurried to appease the rich and powerful. The Prime Minister effectively gave another $1.5 billion to better-off private schools while the Leader of the Opposition simply promised more. This extra funding for the well-off would be much better spent on disadvantaged government and private schools.
There are disturbing signs that the Gillard Government is preparing to dump the Gonski report and blame Coalition state governments for its failure to act on the report.
The Government’s new school kids bonus grant to families to replace the tax rebate on education expenses is an education payment in name only. It can be spent on anything. It would be much better spent on lifting the education outcomes of disadvantaged students.
A new research paper published by Save Our Schools shows that virtually all high SES Catholic combined and secondary schools in Australia are over-funded. This over-funding should be diverted to better support disadvantaged schools and students.
Government schools are vulnerable to getting nothing out of the Gonski review because of federal/state wrangling while private schools get massive over-funding guaranteed for another five years. The Gillard Government should go it alone and increase funding for government schools.
A puzzling aspect of the Gonski review of school funding is that the Government’s policy that no school would lose a dollar of funding as a result of the review is not in the terms of reference of the inquiry. It raises the question of whether the review went beyond its terms of reference in following this policy.<
The Gillard Government has turned its back on disadvantaged students by refusing to commit to the funding increase recommended by the Gonski report which would primarily benefit government schools. A new “no losers” guarantee incorporated in the model may mean that many private schools get a funding increase to put them in line with the so-called funding maintained schools.
In 2011, 20 primary and secondary schools in high income Melbourne suburbs were over-funded by $43 million. Total Federal Government funding for these schools was nearly double what they were entitled to under the SES scheme. The scheme should be terminated and replaced by one designed to reduce disadvantage in education.
Claims that Catholic schools are under-funded in comparison with government schools are simplistic and misleading. It is government schools which are under-funded because they do the heavy lifting in education. They enrol the vast majority of low income, Indigenous, remote area and disability students.
School fees in Queensland’s elite private schools have increased by nearly 6% in 2012, well over cost increases of 3.9%. Eleven elite schools will get $57 million in Federal Government funding in 2012.
SearchLatest News from Chris Bonnor's Education Media Watch